Bringing you information, opinions and views on the political scene in the Crowsnest Pass since 2008
Friday, August 31, 2012
Who's in control in the Crowsnest Pass
Click on Picture to enlarge.
Thanks again to Gord much appreciate your work.
Unfortunately I have been away for a couple of weeks, I have been following my fellow bloggers comments http://blog.johnprince.ca/ it appears there is more and more for the residents of the Crowsnest Pass to be concerned about.
Labels:
Crowsnest Pass,
Humour,
Lawsuits?,
Who's in control?
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Gopher Hunting in the Crowsnest Pass
Anybody else remember the attitude that was taken at the town hall meeting regarding stupid rumours? Remember that little speech?
How the idea of a gopher hunter being paid $850 a day was laughed off?
Well read the front page of today's Promoter.
Next thing you know somebody will try and tell us that the Peace Officers will pay for themselves.
How the idea of a gopher hunter being paid $850 a day was laughed off?
Well read the front page of today's Promoter.
Next thing you know somebody will try and tell us that the Peace Officers will pay for themselves.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Community Peace Officer Program (paying for itself?)
Community Peace Officer Program
Interesting I was reading last weeks council package and
came across the following:
"The Community Peace Officer Program or any Municipal Enforcement if structured properly can be self sufficient and provide a needed service that the community rate payers expect at an affordable price.
For Example:
The City of Cold Lake AB with a population 12,000 has an enforcement division whom work collectively with the local RCMP detachment. They have three CPO's and since the inception of the CPO program three years ago they are now in 2012 experiencing additional revenue generation that will lead to self sufficiency.
The Town of Morinville AB with a population of 8,000 has two CPO's who work collectivity with the local RCMP detachment which are also experiencing the same outcome.
The City of Yellowknife NWT with a population of 20,000 who works collectively with the local RCMP detachment has 6 constables, 2 cpl, 1 manager, 1 parking constable, and two support administration personnel. They conduct the same duties and responsibilities as our CPO's. Therefore to operate this city program only $128,000 was funded by the rate payers.
The Municipality of Crowsnest Pass is no different with two CPO's who also work collectively with the Local RCMP detachment (which we do not financially compensate) compared to the other communities mention above. Our CPO program enhancement will be cost effective, efficient and we will strive towards being self sufficient".
The comments above surprised me for one I see Cold Lake’s
program which was put into place three
years ago, “they are now in 2012 experiencing additional revenue generation
that will lead toward self sufficiency”. Wow, I thought this program was going
to pay for itself? Maybe 5-10 years down the road.
The town of Morinville
has two CPO ’s (they also have about 40% more
people than we do) and they “are also experiencing the same outcome”? Scary
The City of Yellowknife
being compared to the Crowsnest Pass
is just silly, they have a budget of close to $80 million dollars a year, and
is the central hub of activity for the North West
Territory .
So being the inquisitive type of person I am I did a little
bit of checking around to see how successful these other programs have been. I
could only find financial information on Cold
Lake .
Under their budget for 2012 you can see for yourself,
policing and bylaw services are “far” from paying for themselves under Police
services they have a budget of $1,975,494 with revenue of $682,000 coming in.
Under Animal Control/Bylaw Enforcement they have a budget of $503,967 and
revenue of $60,700 coming in. I think the numbers above show “self sufficiency”
being a long way down the road.
Is this what the Crowsnest
Pass will face?
Thursday, August 2, 2012
Good News, Bad News Hidden Taxes in the Crowsnest Pass
Yesterday I received some information regarding the triennial
budget, Information that I had requested from the Municipality back in June. Big
thanks to CAO Myron Thompson and his staff
for getting that to me.
First, the good news there is no projected Utility Rate
Increases for 2013-2014 (Water, Sewer, Garbage, Recycling)
The Bad News our Franchise Fees will be going up next year,
the fee we pay on our Gas bills that is then handed over to the municipality will
increase next year by 75% which will take an additional $211,980 out of the
taxpayers pockets.
The fee we pay on our power bill will be increasing by 43%,
which will take a further $124,965 out of the taxpayer’s pockets.
That means in total an additional $336,945 will leave our
bank accounts and be used to feed the municipalities appetite.
The only bright note from this is that the municipality will
have reached the maximum it can charge for Franchise Fees at that point, so
barring a change in regulations by the provincial government it will not go any
higher.
Above I have just indicated what the increase in Franchise
Fees will be for next year. In total Franchise Fees collected in 2013 will be
$906,694 or roughly $285 per household.
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Want to be late this is what it will cost you. Fair or not?.
First of all I have to say I agree in theory everybody
should pay their taxes on time plus their credit card bills, bank loans,
utility bills etc, etc.
Unfortunately, the world is not perfect and sometimes for
whatever reason people can’t pay their bills on time. That is why banks, credit
cards, utilities and yes various levels of government (Including
municipalities) get to charge penalties. Personally, I don’t have a problem
with that if I am not going to pay a bill on time it should cost me more.
The issue is always are the rates being charged fair? How do
we determine fair? Well in my mind you do it by comparing to what other people
in the same field charge.
If it’s a credit card and the average rate is 10% I don’t
have a problem being charged 10%. If it’s a utility company and the average
late charge is 2% I don’t mind being charged (hold on) 2%.
So how does our municipalities 52% rate for being late
compare? Is it fair? Let’s take a look at what the competition (other
municipalities) are charging.
Town of Pincher Creek 22%
Didsbury 18%
City of Red Deer
12%
Gibbons 26%
MD of Bonnyville 10%
MD of Greenview 18%
Ponoka 28%
Rocky View County
12%
Mayerthorpe 12%
Bashaw 12%
Taber 12%
Olds 18%
Two Hills 12%
Coalhurst 18%
Vermillion 12%
Brooks 26%
That’s just 26 examples of municipalities that I could find,
on average they are charging 15.9%. Now I am sure there are municipalities out
there charging higher and lower rates if somebody wants to send me those
examples I would gladly add them and adjust the average number accordingly. Do I
think there is any way possible to bring that 15.9% average any where close to
our 52%. I think the question of fairness has been answered.
Labels:
52%,
Back Taxes,
Crowsnest Pass,
Fairness,
Tax penalties
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)