Showing posts with label Municipal Council. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Municipal Council. Show all posts

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Control the name of the Game.


Somebody once told me that when a new government is elected they go through a period of time where the electors are very patience, very understanding and accept that every thing does not change over night.
This period his often referred to as the honeymoon phase, during my two terms of council this phase lasted about six months.
Since the election I was not at all surprised that things were pretty quite then for the first six months, I was a little surprised with the next six months (Apr 11-Oct 11), then I was shocked that the last six months have been so subdued.
But I have to keep in mind that our local government has been acting like the good folks at the Lotto 649 they were selling hope (Strategic plan, Municipal reorganization, Improved efficiencies etc, etc).
Suddenly the last couple of weeks it was like Spring came early, a rebirth around town, people started talking about local politics and not in the Pollyanna sense that I have heard over the last eighteen months, but in the sense that they are starting to ask questions and have expectations.
“When is the strategic plan going to do something for us”, “why is the municipal hiring so many new people”, “where are the inefficiencies”, “how much are we spending on consultants”, “are our taxes going up”.
Then two weeks ago “the cancellation of TITV” all of a sudden the local media jumped on board, editorials were written that put our local government in less than a positive light, they have started to ask questions. Maybe just maybe the honeymoon is over, let’s be honest folks I have lived here for almost 30 years and this council has gotten a fairly easy ride from the media compared to previous councils.
On my first term on council I was told if you can’t handle the heat get out of the kitchen. So I felt it would be interesting to see how this council reacts over the next few months to feeling a little bit of pressure from the public and the media.  Well I did not have to wait a few months, Tuesday night March 20 I went to the council meeting. I expected just a regular council meeting, they went through the normal course of business. Just prior to going into camera the Mayor announces that he is going to do something different. He is going to allow the media the opportunity to ask a question each to clarify anything that may have happened that night. Didn’t seem like a bad idea until suddenly the Mayor seized the opportunity to chastise the media for some “blatant errors in both papers reporting over the last few weeks”, then the lecture turned to how critical it is that they report the council proceeding “accurately”. When a member of the media attempted to respond to his comments she was shut down very quickly and told this is not a “debate”.  
Wow, I realized at that moment why there is so little debate during the council meeting, (debate to me is not taking a moment to agree with the party line, or making the right motion). If this had been 30 years ago in the old USSR I think those members of  the media would have been carted off to the Gulag.     
During my six years on council I always believed I had the right to disagree with the media, to not like what they were printing. Never once did I feel like I had the right to control what they had to say to make sure that they reported “accurately”.
It will be very interesting to see how the media reports from this point forward!.            

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Gold Creek Development in the Crowsnest Pass

July 20 the Gold Creek Development came to Council to seek approval on their development agreement and the amount of security they would be required to post with the Municipality prior to commencing.
They provided information that gave a list of quotes for the various types of work required which came to a total of $738,000, within their documentation I noticed that there was a note attached that stated "the quote could vary by up to +/- 20%" which of course alarmed myself and some of the other councilors.
After some debate came a suggestion from myself that a simple solution which would protect the municipality/taxpayers was to pass the Development Agreement with a condition that the Security Deposit would be raised 20% to $900,000.
Within the debate comments were raised that after what happened at the River run site should we not be proceeding, very carefully. All made sense right?
What occurred after that just blew me away when the vote was called Councilor Mitchell and Mayor Irwin were opposed, Councilors Ward, Cole, Salus and Macleod were in favour. Irwin and Mitchell felt that increasing the Security Deposit was not required.
Thankfully it passed and yes the Developer may feel that the additional security was not necessary but if they live up to their commitments they get all the money back, and the faster they work the faster the money is released, and the Municipality has no risk.
How or why would anybody vote against this?

If anybody does not understand the concerns here I will have pictures of the River Run Development shortly

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

How to get a small town excited about development

Much as been said on other Blog sites regarding development in the Crowsnest Pass, and the silence from members of council regarding some of these developments.
First of all if a development does go bad here there is no question that lots of lawyers will find much employment, and make loads of money. Hopefully it does not come to that.
Anybody that as sat on a municipal council in the province of Alberta understands that issues discussed in camera by council that could be extremely sensitive from a legal point of view can not be discussed publicly, in fact during this term of the present council there was even an attempt by some members of council to remove one councilor because an issue that was dealt with in camera was reported by a local paper. This failed but it certainly drove home the seriousness of speaking to in camera issues.

Anyway lets clear up some misconceptions and rumors here, first of all Councilor Dean Ward as not done any of the following:
I have never been an employee of or received any kind of income from any developer,
I have never appeared in any kind of promotional video or literature for any developer,
I have never attended or lent credibility to any kind of shareholders or investors meeting.
I have never attended any kind of golf tournament, tickets to Flames games or any of those types of little perks provided by any party.

What am I guilty of? Attempting to encourage development in the Crowsnest Pass, to widen our tax base, to encourage business and people to move here. To create employment, have we been successful?
Some what on Highway 3 we have a development with 34 units built and another block of 6 units being started these units will bring in $150,000 a year in residential taxes, have created a number of construction jobs and supported some of our local businesses.

Other developers have come in to our sleepy little town and created quite a stir with flashy headlines and big proposals, yes councils, investors and numerous other folks have gotten excited and caught up in it.
Look at the following 23 headlines taken from our local paper dating back to 2005 there was a lot more people than just councilors that got caught up in this project.
Will this project or any other work out? I don't know.
We as a council just need to make sure that the communities best interests are looked after, and that taxpayer dollars are not spent pursuing somebodies dreams.

What is really amazing, over the last five years is the number of people that offered me all kinds of advice about how we needed to do everything possible to support development, and what a great thing some of these developers were.
Some of those same people today are telling me I can not believe you folks got sucked in by this stuff.

Council hears Sentinel ?resort village? Proposal Oct 3, 2005
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1933876

Subdivision approval next step for Bridgegate December 6, 2005
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1934028

Two milestones for Bridgegate development January 24, 2006
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1934169

Bridgegate budget now over a billion March 2, 2006
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1934272

Plans presented for River Run July 19, 2006
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1934547

River Run plans given go-ahead August 17, 2006
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1934641

Bridgegate rezoning approved Dec 7, 2006
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1935066

Bridgegate pressing forward Dec 22, 2006
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1935165

River Run gets go-ahead Jan 24, 2007
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1935264

Chamber hears Bridgecreek plans Feb 16, 2007
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1935350

Bridgecreek commits to millions April 19, 2007
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1935567

Local development hits minor road block May 17, 2007
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1935670

Town receives funding for Bridgegate project June 28, 2007
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1935808

River Run Rolling July 19, 2007
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1935863

Things flow well at River Run Jan 17, 2008
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1936386

Hotel/pool coming to Pass Jan 17, 2008
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1936376

Developing developments in the Pass April 17, 2008
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1936618

Crowsnest Lake construction this year April 17, 2008
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1936610

River Run project still on course June 26, 2008
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1936855
A new year: a new development? Jan 16, 2009
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1388070

A new year: a new development? Jan 16, 2009
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1521519

Coal dust threatens river Feb 6, 2009
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1420330

Bridgecreek consolidating offices July 31, 2009
http://crowsnestpasspromoter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1678278