Just an another attempt to keep my readers fully informed.
We have to make sure that we do not get caught up as one of my commenter's stated in "smoke and mirrors".
So lets continue to compare apples to apples.
2010 achieved a 3.2% tax increase (which brought in an additional $200,000), despite $450,000 into reserves, and $250,000 into new equipment.
2011 achieved a 0% tax increase with no money placed into reserves, for new equipment no dollars spend, equipment will be paid for by borrowing, debt load increased bt $550,000.
Another important factor to remember before we all finish thrashing around in the glory of the 0% tax increase.
The end result may well not be the 0% the province as not set the education portion for the municipalities yet,
That increased by $150,000 last year about 75% of that tax increase, provincial budget is supposed to be announced on Feb 24th.
In addition the assessment process is usually not completed at this point so that usually ends up in a tweaking of the budget.
Time will tell.
Showing posts with label 2011 Budget. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2011 Budget. Show all posts
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
2011 Budget passed 0%? (Really)
First of all I would say congratulations to the new council on passing a budget with a 0% increase.
Some comments raised with me today around town regarding this budget.
Why didn't the previous council pass a budget with a 0% increase?
Good question first of all we could have. Last year we raised taxes 3.2%, remember each 1% increase in taxes equals roughly $65,000. So 3.2% equalled $200,000.
How can I make the statement that we could have done 0%.
Well think about this, in 2010 council placed $450,000 back into reserves, council also took $250,000 and purchased equipment. That a total of $700,000 minus the $200,000 (tax increase) that would have left $500,000 divided by $65,000 that comes out to 7.7% yes if the last council had took the same position as this council, taxes could have been "cut" by 7.7%.
Why did they not do that especially in an election year?
I can only speak for myself.
After years of depleting the municipal reserves and arguing that we needed to get our financies in order. I felt it was time and the responsible thing to do to start rebuilding those reserves. In fact on a number of occasions I heard present councilors stress the need for building up the reserves.
Two, previous council had a policy of spending $250,000 each year to replace the aging equipment fleet, not by incurring debt but by actually putting aside dollars each year.
Number of dollars allocated in 2011 to reserves? Zero
Number of dollars allocated to purchase equipment $550,000 all of it in debt.
How many new employees will be hired because of this new budget?
One new Foreman position for public works
One new position for HR
One new position for Community Services, one employee was previously looking after programming and FCSS, there will now be a full time position for each job (1 becomes 2)
One half time position for finance.
One full time position for Agricultural Services this used to be a part time position
Did the Mayor state that over time, positions will be eliminated by attrition, retirement and reassignment of job duties?
Yes he did, do you really think that CUPE is going to co-operate with management to eliminate positions. Do you really believe that positions will not be refilled? we will find out in March.
Another councilor as stated on his blog that at least we did not raise taxes in our first year 11.2% like the previous council.
Well first of all let me say I never voted for that, so I will not take on that responsibility.
Second the last council left the municipality in a much better financial position our last year we left a budget with a surplus of $450,000 to be placed back into reserves. In 2007 the new council was left with a deficit to deal with.
Also this council did not have the anchor around its neck of having to put $100,000 plus into the Crowsnest Centre! another 2%.
The comment was made last night that taxes should have gone up 2-3%, I ask why with no money in reserves and financing new equipment quite the opposite taxes should have gone down.
But the budget is done now which is good, and we will see where things go. The comment was made during the budget process that between council and administration enough savings could be found in the next six months to pay for the back hoe. So I look forward to seeing a huge surplus in 2011
Some comments raised with me today around town regarding this budget.
Why didn't the previous council pass a budget with a 0% increase?
Good question first of all we could have. Last year we raised taxes 3.2%, remember each 1% increase in taxes equals roughly $65,000. So 3.2% equalled $200,000.
How can I make the statement that we could have done 0%.
Well think about this, in 2010 council placed $450,000 back into reserves, council also took $250,000 and purchased equipment. That a total of $700,000 minus the $200,000 (tax increase) that would have left $500,000 divided by $65,000 that comes out to 7.7% yes if the last council had took the same position as this council, taxes could have been "cut" by 7.7%.
Why did they not do that especially in an election year?
I can only speak for myself.
After years of depleting the municipal reserves and arguing that we needed to get our financies in order. I felt it was time and the responsible thing to do to start rebuilding those reserves. In fact on a number of occasions I heard present councilors stress the need for building up the reserves.
Two, previous council had a policy of spending $250,000 each year to replace the aging equipment fleet, not by incurring debt but by actually putting aside dollars each year.
Number of dollars allocated in 2011 to reserves? Zero
Number of dollars allocated to purchase equipment $550,000 all of it in debt.
How many new employees will be hired because of this new budget?
One new Foreman position for public works
One new position for HR
One new position for Community Services, one employee was previously looking after programming and FCSS, there will now be a full time position for each job (1 becomes 2)
One half time position for finance.
One full time position for Agricultural Services this used to be a part time position
Did the Mayor state that over time, positions will be eliminated by attrition, retirement and reassignment of job duties?
Yes he did, do you really think that CUPE is going to co-operate with management to eliminate positions. Do you really believe that positions will not be refilled? we will find out in March.
Another councilor as stated on his blog that at least we did not raise taxes in our first year 11.2% like the previous council.
Well first of all let me say I never voted for that, so I will not take on that responsibility.
Second the last council left the municipality in a much better financial position our last year we left a budget with a surplus of $450,000 to be placed back into reserves. In 2007 the new council was left with a deficit to deal with.
Also this council did not have the anchor around its neck of having to put $100,000 plus into the Crowsnest Centre! another 2%.
The comment was made last night that taxes should have gone up 2-3%, I ask why with no money in reserves and financing new equipment quite the opposite taxes should have gone down.
But the budget is done now which is good, and we will see where things go. The comment was made during the budget process that between council and administration enough savings could be found in the next six months to pay for the back hoe. So I look forward to seeing a huge surplus in 2011
Crowsnest Pass Council Meeting Feb 1, 2011
Crowsnest Pass Council Meeting Feb 1, 2011
Adoption of Agenda:
Councilor Mitchell added item #7 under other business Emergency Manual
Mayor Decoux removed Item #4 under other business AUMA Mayors Caucus
Motion to accept amended agenda passed unanimously
Adoption of previous Minutes
Few minor spelling errors motion to accept minutes as corrected passed unanimously
Delegations:
Mark Murphy from Emergency Management Services for Southern Alberta was scheduled to present an update on the CNP emergency plan he was unable to attend so CAO Tully Clifford presented his comments instead on our municipal emergency plan.
He felt that the present plan is very good, and the municipality is very well prepared. Also stated that the plan will be formatted and placed on the municipal web site.
Admin and Agency Reports: None
Business Arising from the Minutes:
Budget 2011.
Concerns and comments raised by council:
Hiring of more staff
Not raising taxes a good thing
Money needs to go into reserves but will be dealt with later in the year
Some felt the need for Track Hoe
One councilor felt that the $30,000 removed from advertising should be placed back in.
Need more staff in the office
Taxes should go up 2-3%
Could we not just get by with the Foreman and the HR person
Track if purchased should have all the necessary equipment to go with it.
External organizations should have clear terms of reference, and mandates
It is a myth that the municipal office has too many employees
Retirement, attrition and reassignment of work duties will reduce the workforce down the road.
Concern about holding tax increases to low amounts and then hitting the taxpayers harder in future years.
Motion to accept the budget as presented passed by a vote of 5-1 Councilor Saje absent and Councilor Saindon opposed.
Correspondence:
Alberta Order of Excellence, council members to provide names to CAO
Committee Reports
1. G+P minutes January 25 motion to accept passed unanimously
2. Municipal Heritage Board Minutes of April 28, 2010 motion to accept passed unanimously
3. Police Advisory Board Minutes of November 29 motion to accept passed unanimously
Bylaws: None
Notices of Motion: None
Other Business:
1. Proposed Policy Development Procedures and Templates Motion to accept passed unanimously; Mayor Decoux also raised the issue of the policy committee and expanding its membership by adding two councilors. Motion to accept and add councilors Mitchell and Gallant passed unanimously
2. Appointments to the SDA, Motion to accept the appointments of Bill MacIntyre and Loretta Thompson to the SDA passed unanimously
3. Approval for signage on Municipal property besides the Blairmore Liquor store. Motion to deny passed unanimously.
4. AUMA mayors caucus removed by Mayor Decoux
5. Senior Housing Board appointment, Motion to accept Sasha Jagerbaird to the Seniors Board passed unanimously
6. Tipping Fee Request, Request by a non-profit group to remove an older home and have the municipality waive the tipping fees. Councilor Saindon motioned for the municipality to take the concrete and brick to the municipal pit in Passburg and the rest of the material to go to the land fill with the municipality covering the first $2000 of tipping fees. Motion passed 5-1 Councilor Gallant opposed.
7. Emergency Manuals, added to the agenda by Councilor Mitchell and withdrew by Councilor Mitchell
Council Member reports: Councilor Saindon attended the Chinook Library board meeting; Mayor Decoux attended the Devon cheque presentation. Councilor Gail stated that he intended to attend the cheque presentation but did not.
Public Input: None
In Camera: None
Motion to adjourn: Passed unanimously.
Adoption of Agenda:
Councilor Mitchell added item #7 under other business Emergency Manual
Mayor Decoux removed Item #4 under other business AUMA Mayors Caucus
Motion to accept amended agenda passed unanimously
Adoption of previous Minutes
Few minor spelling errors motion to accept minutes as corrected passed unanimously
Delegations:
Mark Murphy from Emergency Management Services for Southern Alberta was scheduled to present an update on the CNP emergency plan he was unable to attend so CAO Tully Clifford presented his comments instead on our municipal emergency plan.
He felt that the present plan is very good, and the municipality is very well prepared. Also stated that the plan will be formatted and placed on the municipal web site.
Admin and Agency Reports: None
Business Arising from the Minutes:
Budget 2011.
Concerns and comments raised by council:
Hiring of more staff
Not raising taxes a good thing
Money needs to go into reserves but will be dealt with later in the year
Some felt the need for Track Hoe
One councilor felt that the $30,000 removed from advertising should be placed back in.
Need more staff in the office
Taxes should go up 2-3%
Could we not just get by with the Foreman and the HR person
Track if purchased should have all the necessary equipment to go with it.
External organizations should have clear terms of reference, and mandates
It is a myth that the municipal office has too many employees
Retirement, attrition and reassignment of work duties will reduce the workforce down the road.
Concern about holding tax increases to low amounts and then hitting the taxpayers harder in future years.
Motion to accept the budget as presented passed by a vote of 5-1 Councilor Saje absent and Councilor Saindon opposed.
Correspondence:
Alberta Order of Excellence, council members to provide names to CAO
Committee Reports
1. G+P minutes January 25 motion to accept passed unanimously
2. Municipal Heritage Board Minutes of April 28, 2010 motion to accept passed unanimously
3. Police Advisory Board Minutes of November 29 motion to accept passed unanimously
Bylaws: None
Notices of Motion: None
Other Business:
1. Proposed Policy Development Procedures and Templates Motion to accept passed unanimously; Mayor Decoux also raised the issue of the policy committee and expanding its membership by adding two councilors. Motion to accept and add councilors Mitchell and Gallant passed unanimously
2. Appointments to the SDA, Motion to accept the appointments of Bill MacIntyre and Loretta Thompson to the SDA passed unanimously
3. Approval for signage on Municipal property besides the Blairmore Liquor store. Motion to deny passed unanimously.
4. AUMA mayors caucus removed by Mayor Decoux
5. Senior Housing Board appointment, Motion to accept Sasha Jagerbaird to the Seniors Board passed unanimously
6. Tipping Fee Request, Request by a non-profit group to remove an older home and have the municipality waive the tipping fees. Councilor Saindon motioned for the municipality to take the concrete and brick to the municipal pit in Passburg and the rest of the material to go to the land fill with the municipality covering the first $2000 of tipping fees. Motion passed 5-1 Councilor Gallant opposed.
7. Emergency Manuals, added to the agenda by Councilor Mitchell and withdrew by Councilor Mitchell
Council Member reports: Councilor Saindon attended the Chinook Library board meeting; Mayor Decoux attended the Devon cheque presentation. Councilor Gail stated that he intended to attend the cheque presentation but did not.
Public Input: None
In Camera: None
Motion to adjourn: Passed unanimously.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Budget so what happens tonight? Crowsnest Pass
Well last meeting council sent administration away, to review the 2011 budget package.
I "assumed" (bad word) that tonight they would come back with a slightly fine tuned package that allows the politicians to look better.
If you go to the right of my blog and click on the Municipal Web site, you can read for yourself under council packages what is being brought back by administration tonight.
It's the same proposal as last time, so the politicians have clearly had the tough choices thrown back into their lap by administration.
Many Options available:
They can eat what they are being spoon fed.
They can go with a recommended 0% tax increase, or 1 or 2%.
They can choice to create 5 more positions, using the old government theory that we have to get bigger before we get smaller.
They can choice to not put any dollars into reserves.
They can choice to finance two new pieces of equipment, or one or none.
Or they can choice to do something different.
I hear of nothing for affordable housing, marketing the community, economic development, prelimary studies for new facilities etc etc.
Keep in mind that if any of these things are going to be done there will have to be dollars provided at some point. By this time next year when their second budget is finalized their term will be almost half over.
I agree with Councilor Saje no new positions should be hired until the organizational review takes place. We all know once the new positions are in place no review is going to say that a mistake was made. Unfortunatly Councilor Saje will not be there tonight.
Anyway it will be interesting to see what comes out of tonight.
I "assumed" (bad word) that tonight they would come back with a slightly fine tuned package that allows the politicians to look better.
If you go to the right of my blog and click on the Municipal Web site, you can read for yourself under council packages what is being brought back by administration tonight.
It's the same proposal as last time, so the politicians have clearly had the tough choices thrown back into their lap by administration.
Many Options available:
They can eat what they are being spoon fed.
They can go with a recommended 0% tax increase, or 1 or 2%.
They can choice to create 5 more positions, using the old government theory that we have to get bigger before we get smaller.
They can choice to not put any dollars into reserves.
They can choice to finance two new pieces of equipment, or one or none.
Or they can choice to do something different.
I hear of nothing for affordable housing, marketing the community, economic development, prelimary studies for new facilities etc etc.
Keep in mind that if any of these things are going to be done there will have to be dollars provided at some point. By this time next year when their second budget is finalized their term will be almost half over.
I agree with Councilor Saje no new positions should be hired until the organizational review takes place. We all know once the new positions are in place no review is going to say that a mistake was made. Unfortunatly Councilor Saje will not be there tonight.
Anyway it will be interesting to see what comes out of tonight.
Friday, January 28, 2011
2011 Crowsnest Pass Budget, dollars and the wonderful things you can do with them.
Council this week looked for more clarification on a few issues, that they appear to be going around and around on.
Administration has given them the opportunity to have a 0% increase on the tax rate.
This is good in the sense that are taxes are high enough, I agree with Councilor Gallant that taxes are a deterrent to attracting people and businesses to the Pass.
Hard enough to say to a coal miner we want you to travel an extra hour a day to work, plus we will charge you an additional $700 a year in taxes to live here.
The bad side to this budget is there is absolutely no allowance for dollars into the reserves for a number of years those reserves were depleted to catch up on infrastructure projects. Two years ago the majority of council put an end to a proposed new shop in Coleman that started out at a cost of less than $400,000 and grew to $1,300,000 which would have virtually wiped out almost all the reserves we had.
Council last year budgeted for $450,000 to be put back into reserves which would have allowed them to grow for the first time in many years. To allow for that same amount to be put in reserves with the present proposed budget you would be looking at a 7% tax increase.
The issue of borrowing money to buy equipment, for the last six years council set aside $250,000 per year for purchasing new equipment. This year that $250,000 is not being put aside its being borrowed in addition to another $300,000 to buy a grader and a track hoe. If that $250,000 was put into the budget for equipment you would now be looking at a 4% tax increase, instead the municipality is taking on $550,000 of debt.
Number of councilors have raised the concern about the justification of the track hoe, administration stated that they are spending $10-13,000 a year to rent a machine. Those numbers by any financial formula do not justify borrowing $250,000 the saving will not even cover the payment on a machine, let alone depreciation.
The issue of hiring, one I struggled with personally for years. I agree with Councilor Saje do an organizational review before you hire more people. Much wiser approach than Councilor Mitchell standard position of “if administration feels we need these positions,then we should fill them”
Administration argues that they have to grow to find the inefficiencies in the organization, with positions being deleted down the road as attrition takes place.
Government positions seldom disappear once they are put in place, work is found to
justify them. In addition you run into labor relations issues with your employees, I have never yet heard of a CUPE local that stated we don’t need that position any more.
Water Meters are going to be sent to the purgatory known as further study.
Administration is also counting on the sale of municipal land to the tune of $125,000 to balance the budget, the current market is almost making the sale of land impossible unless you are prepared to give it away. Should the municipality do that with the taxpayers assets? Should they be in competition with private sellers forcing land values even lower?
Where will the process go from here? A number of councilors have already expressed the willingness to increase taxes by a smaller number than 5.3%.
They will chop at least a couple of the full time positions, placing those savings into reserves, they will increase taxes by 1-2% with the cash like wise going to reserves. The fiscally conservative councilors will get to vote against the increase, which will pass any way.
The track hoe will also go the same direction as the water meters, to be re evaluated when further inefficiencies are found.
Finally Councilor Saje raised the issue of the lack of dollars (zero) for the New Strategic Direction of council, I also have not heard of any dollars for marketing or promoting the community. Likewise for new recreation facilities, affordable housing the only reference that as been mentioned in that regard is Councilor’s Gail idea to put a tax on weekenders that own more than one home in the Pass, which some how will encourage those people to provide those home’s to lower income families.
Administration has given them the opportunity to have a 0% increase on the tax rate.
This is good in the sense that are taxes are high enough, I agree with Councilor Gallant that taxes are a deterrent to attracting people and businesses to the Pass.
Hard enough to say to a coal miner we want you to travel an extra hour a day to work, plus we will charge you an additional $700 a year in taxes to live here.
The bad side to this budget is there is absolutely no allowance for dollars into the reserves for a number of years those reserves were depleted to catch up on infrastructure projects. Two years ago the majority of council put an end to a proposed new shop in Coleman that started out at a cost of less than $400,000 and grew to $1,300,000 which would have virtually wiped out almost all the reserves we had.
Council last year budgeted for $450,000 to be put back into reserves which would have allowed them to grow for the first time in many years. To allow for that same amount to be put in reserves with the present proposed budget you would be looking at a 7% tax increase.
The issue of borrowing money to buy equipment, for the last six years council set aside $250,000 per year for purchasing new equipment. This year that $250,000 is not being put aside its being borrowed in addition to another $300,000 to buy a grader and a track hoe. If that $250,000 was put into the budget for equipment you would now be looking at a 4% tax increase, instead the municipality is taking on $550,000 of debt.
Number of councilors have raised the concern about the justification of the track hoe, administration stated that they are spending $10-13,000 a year to rent a machine. Those numbers by any financial formula do not justify borrowing $250,000 the saving will not even cover the payment on a machine, let alone depreciation.
The issue of hiring, one I struggled with personally for years. I agree with Councilor Saje do an organizational review before you hire more people. Much wiser approach than Councilor Mitchell standard position of “if administration feels we need these positions,then we should fill them”
Administration argues that they have to grow to find the inefficiencies in the organization, with positions being deleted down the road as attrition takes place.
Government positions seldom disappear once they are put in place, work is found to
justify them. In addition you run into labor relations issues with your employees, I have never yet heard of a CUPE local that stated we don’t need that position any more.
Water Meters are going to be sent to the purgatory known as further study.
Administration is also counting on the sale of municipal land to the tune of $125,000 to balance the budget, the current market is almost making the sale of land impossible unless you are prepared to give it away. Should the municipality do that with the taxpayers assets? Should they be in competition with private sellers forcing land values even lower?
Where will the process go from here? A number of councilors have already expressed the willingness to increase taxes by a smaller number than 5.3%.
They will chop at least a couple of the full time positions, placing those savings into reserves, they will increase taxes by 1-2% with the cash like wise going to reserves. The fiscally conservative councilors will get to vote against the increase, which will pass any way.
The track hoe will also go the same direction as the water meters, to be re evaluated when further inefficiencies are found.
Finally Councilor Saje raised the issue of the lack of dollars (zero) for the New Strategic Direction of council, I also have not heard of any dollars for marketing or promoting the community. Likewise for new recreation facilities, affordable housing the only reference that as been mentioned in that regard is Councilor’s Gail idea to put a tax on weekenders that own more than one home in the Pass, which some how will encourage those people to provide those home’s to lower income families.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Special Council Meeting Jan 25, 2011
Special Council Meeting Jan 25, 2011
Adoption of Agenda:
Mayor Decoux added two additional Personnel items in camera.
Motion to accept agenda as amended passed unanimously
Business arising from the Minutes:
1. 2011 Budget
CAO presented a list of changes to the budget to eliminate the need for a tax increase.
Increases of the following:
$24,000 to make a benefit clerk full time
$50,000 to demolish the Maplevue Hall
$14,538 Casual Wages Rescue
Then the following reductions
Advertising of $30,000
New rug for the office $34,200
Table + Chairs for the council chambers $7000
CCHS/Hokuto exchange $250
Thunder in the valley traffic control $500
Policing Thunder in the valley $30,000
Bellcrest Community Association $500
Coleman Community Association $1500
Casual Wages for Fire Departments
Coleman $1,800
Blairmore $8,500
Bellevue $4,100
Hillcrest $4,900
Benefits on wages for fire departments
Coleman $1,920
Blairmore $3,090
Bellevue $1,440
Hillcrest $2,055
Permanent Staff Rescue $14,538
Foothills Regional Inc $11,000
Bylaw Contracted Services $650
Public Works Casuals $11,700
Streets and Roads Casuals $24,400
Coleman Metering $7,000
Sanitary Sewer Casual $20,900
Sanitary Landfill tipping fees $41,000
Chamber of Commerce $4,800
Pool-Floor Tiling $15,000
Crowsnest Museum Grant $2,000
Allied Arts Grant $7,500
Library Grant $5,646
Archiving System $30,000
Parade Float $10,000
Hillcrest Fire department storage shed $10,000
Generator for Municipal Office $30,000
Sno-Gates $15,000
Plus Revenue from Municipal Land Sales was estimated to bring in $75,000 now increased to $125,000.
He also stated that all dollars for protective services and external organizations would be maintained at 2010 levels. In addition felt that council should meet with the ski hill and swimming pool boards to discuss there operations.
Then the following comments and questions were raised by councilors:
Emile Saindon-
Concerns about the recycling contract and why none of the revenue was coming back to the municipality, feels the contract should be renegotiated.
Take another look at the recreation programmer.
Advertising for the ski hill and an additional snow gun.
Felt that the Track Hoe could be financed by reduction of inefficiencies in the budget realized by council and administration in the next six months.
Larry Mitchell-
Money for water meters that comes out of reserves will it be put back.
CAO suggested that this program come back for further review
Concerned about no dollars going into reserves.
Feels that the Ski Hill budget should be decreased by 10% a year for the next three years.
Jerry Londsbury-
Concerned that no dollars are being placed into reserves, felt that a small increase made sense for that reason.
Brian Gallant-
Believed that the $6,000 cost for the ski hill web site was a one time cost
$9500 for a green water supply for the golf course is a concern due to them being a private business
Track Hoe needed more justification
Water Meter Funding should be paid for by a different source than reserves
Director of Public Works stated that the green water study would be paid for by the golf course to 50%. Also readdressed the reasoning for the track hoe, stated that the municipality is paying $10-13,000 a year in rental costs.
Seigbert Gail
Stated a small increase in taxes was acceptable
Concerned that there are no dollars to finish the ball/soccer complex
Increased fees for recreation needs to be looked at.
Special Tax for weekenders who own more than one home.
Also opposes water meters.
CAO stated that there needs to be a policy for reserves put in place.
Andrew Saje
Advertising needs to be shown to the public that there is a difference between advertising and public notices
Without an office generator would the municipality be prepared for an emergency
Administration should look at contracting out the archiving
Concerned about the track hoe and whether its warranted
Need to put dollars into reserve.
No allocation for the Ball/soccer complex
Administration spending increases, note a 14% increase in travel, meals and lodging, and a 53% increase in convention costs.
No dollars shown for Council’s strategic direction.
Opposed to increases in additional human resources
Spoke to several public works employees who felt that one of the present lead hands could be promoted instead of hiring.
There should be an organizational review completed before any additional staff hired.
Felt the municipality should change the way it does business before it adds more people
Should seek outside help, use consultants for professional advice a new set of eyes.
Taxpayers have expressed to him the willingness to accept a small tax increase to put money into reserves.
CAO
Felt that the budget provided dollars to invest in the present staff
Felt the organization needed to build capacity for change
Consultants could cost in the range of $3-400,000 and still not provide the additional capacity for change.
Removing the track hoe would not provide a lot of dollars for reserves as it was be payed for by borrowing, the only dollars saved would be the payment.
At this point the Mayor requested that each councilor summarize his concerns so administration could take them away and bring back answers.
Andrew Saje
Take six months for a organizational review/strategic plan prior to hiring
Look at archiving alternatives
More Info on the track hoe.
Seigbert Gail
Would like to see council vote on each major line item
Brian Gallant
Track Hoe justification and hiring additional employees
Jerry Londsbury
Concerned about the municipality having to spend a significant amount of dollars in a short period of time, due to our aging equipment fleet and facilities. Felt that those dollars will have to be provided either by building reserves or borrowing.
Larry Mitchell
Agrees with the need for the back hoe, feels that if administration requires more employees they should be provided. Feels that administration as no spare time, and council should not be micro managing.
Emile Saindon
Numerous opportunities for cutting costs
Concern with the recreation programmer
State of the present facilities
Cam Mertz requested the opportunity to address council
The agricultural services person will be covered of by grant funding
He began to speak about the full time positions for the rec programmer and the FCSS when the Mayor cut short his comments and suggested that he provide any additional information for council to the CAO.
At this point Mayor Decoux made a motion to have the Administration take back councils concerns and re address them with council at a later date.
Motion to accept passed unanimously.
Council by unanimous motion goes In Camera.
Adoption of Agenda:
Mayor Decoux added two additional Personnel items in camera.
Motion to accept agenda as amended passed unanimously
Business arising from the Minutes:
1. 2011 Budget
CAO presented a list of changes to the budget to eliminate the need for a tax increase.
Increases of the following:
$24,000 to make a benefit clerk full time
$50,000 to demolish the Maplevue Hall
$14,538 Casual Wages Rescue
Then the following reductions
Advertising of $30,000
New rug for the office $34,200
Table + Chairs for the council chambers $7000
CCHS/Hokuto exchange $250
Thunder in the valley traffic control $500
Policing Thunder in the valley $30,000
Bellcrest Community Association $500
Coleman Community Association $1500
Casual Wages for Fire Departments
Coleman $1,800
Blairmore $8,500
Bellevue $4,100
Hillcrest $4,900
Benefits on wages for fire departments
Coleman $1,920
Blairmore $3,090
Bellevue $1,440
Hillcrest $2,055
Permanent Staff Rescue $14,538
Foothills Regional Inc $11,000
Bylaw Contracted Services $650
Public Works Casuals $11,700
Streets and Roads Casuals $24,400
Coleman Metering $7,000
Sanitary Sewer Casual $20,900
Sanitary Landfill tipping fees $41,000
Chamber of Commerce $4,800
Pool-Floor Tiling $15,000
Crowsnest Museum Grant $2,000
Allied Arts Grant $7,500
Library Grant $5,646
Archiving System $30,000
Parade Float $10,000
Hillcrest Fire department storage shed $10,000
Generator for Municipal Office $30,000
Sno-Gates $15,000
Plus Revenue from Municipal Land Sales was estimated to bring in $75,000 now increased to $125,000.
He also stated that all dollars for protective services and external organizations would be maintained at 2010 levels. In addition felt that council should meet with the ski hill and swimming pool boards to discuss there operations.
Then the following comments and questions were raised by councilors:
Emile Saindon-
Concerns about the recycling contract and why none of the revenue was coming back to the municipality, feels the contract should be renegotiated.
Take another look at the recreation programmer.
Advertising for the ski hill and an additional snow gun.
Felt that the Track Hoe could be financed by reduction of inefficiencies in the budget realized by council and administration in the next six months.
Larry Mitchell-
Money for water meters that comes out of reserves will it be put back.
CAO suggested that this program come back for further review
Concerned about no dollars going into reserves.
Feels that the Ski Hill budget should be decreased by 10% a year for the next three years.
Jerry Londsbury-
Concerned that no dollars are being placed into reserves, felt that a small increase made sense for that reason.
Brian Gallant-
Believed that the $6,000 cost for the ski hill web site was a one time cost
$9500 for a green water supply for the golf course is a concern due to them being a private business
Track Hoe needed more justification
Water Meter Funding should be paid for by a different source than reserves
Director of Public Works stated that the green water study would be paid for by the golf course to 50%. Also readdressed the reasoning for the track hoe, stated that the municipality is paying $10-13,000 a year in rental costs.
Seigbert Gail
Stated a small increase in taxes was acceptable
Concerned that there are no dollars to finish the ball/soccer complex
Increased fees for recreation needs to be looked at.
Special Tax for weekenders who own more than one home.
Also opposes water meters.
CAO stated that there needs to be a policy for reserves put in place.
Andrew Saje
Advertising needs to be shown to the public that there is a difference between advertising and public notices
Without an office generator would the municipality be prepared for an emergency
Administration should look at contracting out the archiving
Concerned about the track hoe and whether its warranted
Need to put dollars into reserve.
No allocation for the Ball/soccer complex
Administration spending increases, note a 14% increase in travel, meals and lodging, and a 53% increase in convention costs.
No dollars shown for Council’s strategic direction.
Opposed to increases in additional human resources
Spoke to several public works employees who felt that one of the present lead hands could be promoted instead of hiring.
There should be an organizational review completed before any additional staff hired.
Felt the municipality should change the way it does business before it adds more people
Should seek outside help, use consultants for professional advice a new set of eyes.
Taxpayers have expressed to him the willingness to accept a small tax increase to put money into reserves.
CAO
Felt that the budget provided dollars to invest in the present staff
Felt the organization needed to build capacity for change
Consultants could cost in the range of $3-400,000 and still not provide the additional capacity for change.
Removing the track hoe would not provide a lot of dollars for reserves as it was be payed for by borrowing, the only dollars saved would be the payment.
At this point the Mayor requested that each councilor summarize his concerns so administration could take them away and bring back answers.
Andrew Saje
Take six months for a organizational review/strategic plan prior to hiring
Look at archiving alternatives
More Info on the track hoe.
Seigbert Gail
Would like to see council vote on each major line item
Brian Gallant
Track Hoe justification and hiring additional employees
Jerry Londsbury
Concerned about the municipality having to spend a significant amount of dollars in a short period of time, due to our aging equipment fleet and facilities. Felt that those dollars will have to be provided either by building reserves or borrowing.
Larry Mitchell
Agrees with the need for the back hoe, feels that if administration requires more employees they should be provided. Feels that administration as no spare time, and council should not be micro managing.
Emile Saindon
Numerous opportunities for cutting costs
Concern with the recreation programmer
State of the present facilities
Cam Mertz requested the opportunity to address council
The agricultural services person will be covered of by grant funding
He began to speak about the full time positions for the rec programmer and the FCSS when the Mayor cut short his comments and suggested that he provide any additional information for council to the CAO.
At this point Mayor Decoux made a motion to have the Administration take back councils concerns and re address them with council at a later date.
Motion to accept passed unanimously.
Council by unanimous motion goes In Camera.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Tax Increases in the Crowsnest Pass
Recently ran a poll on what would be a reasonable tax increase for 2011, offered up six options on what in my mind would provide an opportunity to cover all ends of the spectrum.
They were, with the corresponding results
0-1% 6 votes 10%
1-2% 7 votes 12%
2-3% 7 votes 12%
3-4% 6 votes 10%
4% or greater 3 votes 5%
Get creative and cut taxes 27 votes 48%
Well from amongst the people that spoke here, the message is loud and clear.
Why is this relevant? for the following reasons: Tuesday Night Jan 18th Mayor Decoux asked council at least twice, "does council feel that they were elected to maintain the status quo, or to bring change to the municipality"
If you read my post on the meeting Councilor Saje offered up change in the form of a budget with some different ideas. Councilor Saje also spoke about how our population and tax base continues to decrease, but our spending goes up and up.
Councilor Saje also spoke about our organizational structure, why does the Pass have a Financial Department and an HR Department, when most other municipalities group the two together?
Councilor Saindon talked about the need to increase user fees, spoke to how the general public can no longer be expected to support programs that only 20% of the public uses. He also addressed the issue of performance of our various facilities.
Councilor Gallant also raised the issue of the Albert Stella arena how it brings in so little revenue versus its costs to operate, he also stated that there is no greater deterrent to bringing in new people and increased tax base than municipal tax increases.
Mayor Decoux stated that positions taken regarding no tax increases are very short sighted, that in the long term you need dollars to invest in the infrastructure of the municipality, or people will go else where, where the streets are all paved and facilities are provided.
Administration responded by making the case that the municipality needs to hire "more" people to find the efficiencies, so that in time as attrition takes place the positions at the municipality will "change" and where possible those efficiencies that the new people find will take place "in time".
Councilor Saje in his motion proposed that operating costs of some departments be reduced by 7%, in a previous post I stated that if you want to find real efficiency improvements that is the way to do it.
If council attempts to "find" the inefficiencies the debate between them and administration will go on forever, give administration clear direction and goals and let the people that do the job every day find the inefficiencies.
Status Quo, versus change, versus being creative.
As far as the 2011 budget, I clearly heard on one hand Councilors Saindon, Saje and Gallant talking about zero tax increases.
On the other hand I heard Mayor Decoux, Councilors Mitchell, Londsbury, and Gail talking about tax increases.
They were, with the corresponding results
0-1% 6 votes 10%
1-2% 7 votes 12%
2-3% 7 votes 12%
3-4% 6 votes 10%
4% or greater 3 votes 5%
Get creative and cut taxes 27 votes 48%
Well from amongst the people that spoke here, the message is loud and clear.
Why is this relevant? for the following reasons: Tuesday Night Jan 18th Mayor Decoux asked council at least twice, "does council feel that they were elected to maintain the status quo, or to bring change to the municipality"
If you read my post on the meeting Councilor Saje offered up change in the form of a budget with some different ideas. Councilor Saje also spoke about how our population and tax base continues to decrease, but our spending goes up and up.
Councilor Saje also spoke about our organizational structure, why does the Pass have a Financial Department and an HR Department, when most other municipalities group the two together?
Councilor Saindon talked about the need to increase user fees, spoke to how the general public can no longer be expected to support programs that only 20% of the public uses. He also addressed the issue of performance of our various facilities.
Councilor Gallant also raised the issue of the Albert Stella arena how it brings in so little revenue versus its costs to operate, he also stated that there is no greater deterrent to bringing in new people and increased tax base than municipal tax increases.
Mayor Decoux stated that positions taken regarding no tax increases are very short sighted, that in the long term you need dollars to invest in the infrastructure of the municipality, or people will go else where, where the streets are all paved and facilities are provided.
Administration responded by making the case that the municipality needs to hire "more" people to find the efficiencies, so that in time as attrition takes place the positions at the municipality will "change" and where possible those efficiencies that the new people find will take place "in time".
Councilor Saje in his motion proposed that operating costs of some departments be reduced by 7%, in a previous post I stated that if you want to find real efficiency improvements that is the way to do it.
If council attempts to "find" the inefficiencies the debate between them and administration will go on forever, give administration clear direction and goals and let the people that do the job every day find the inefficiencies.
Status Quo, versus change, versus being creative.
As far as the 2011 budget, I clearly heard on one hand Councilors Saindon, Saje and Gallant talking about zero tax increases.
On the other hand I heard Mayor Decoux, Councilors Mitchell, Londsbury, and Gail talking about tax increases.
Council Meeting of January 18, 2011
Council Meeting of January 18, 2011
Public Hearing: None
Adoption of Agenda
Additions:
#5 under other business-High water levels in East Coleman
#6 Office Procedures
Under In Camera #1 Land
Motion to accept Agenda as amended passed unanimously
Adoption of Previous Minutes Jan 4, 2011
Correction, Motion made by Councilor Mitchell that states Councilor Mitchell abstained it should have been Councilor Londsbury
Motions to accept corrected Minutes passed unanimously
Delegations: None
Admin and Agency Reports: None
Business Arising from Minutes: None
Correspondence: Two letters one from John Pundyk and the other from Shane Stewart regarding tax increases. Both spoke to the high cost of taxes in the Crowsnest Pass, and the impact on attracting new people to the area.
Councilor Mitchell stated that both letters were good but offered no solutions to the municipalities financial problems, Councilor Saje stated that the solution is not to raise taxes.
Committee Reports: Minutes from G+P meeting of Jan 11,2011
Motion to accept minutes as presented passed unanimously
Bylaws: None
Notice of Motions: None
Other Business:
1. Get Outdoors Weekend: Motion made to support this initiative passed unanimously
2. Elected Officials Course: Motion for all of council except Councilor Saje will participate in an Economic Development Course in Pincher Feb 3, motion passed unanimously.
3. Councilor Saje requested approval for absence for the Feb 1st meeting, motion passed unanimously
4. Budget 2011: Some points regarding the budget
Proposed Budget sitting at a 5.3% increase
Various members of council spoke to a tax increase of between 0% and a small increase (?)
Administration to bring back program/service reductions for the meeting of January 25, and clarification for individual councilors concerns.
Various new positions are included in the budget-additional person in the HR department, one new programmer in the Recreation area, a full time Agricultural service field man, a Foreman for public works, and a part time position for the finance department, also two additional casuals over last year usage. (This will be served up Jan 25 as a cost reduction)
There was a lot of debate around the performance of facilities and various services/programs.
Prior to the debate Councilor Saje attempted to make a motion on the budget which the Mayor requested that he hold of on until the debate took place.
After the debate Councilor Londsbury moved to table the budget until Jan 25, to which Councilor Saje stated that he had attempted to make a motion prior that dealt with the budget.
The Mayor asked Councilor Londsbury to withdraw his motion, to allow Councilor Saje motion to be dealt with.
Councilor Saje then made a motion to accept the 2011 budget with the following conditions:
1.The $230,000 for the back hoe to be removed from the budget
2. IT archiving to be suspended until outside options can be looked at
3. IT Desktop be reduced to $10,000
4. IT soft ware be reduced to $12,000
5. Parade Float be reduced to $5,000
6. All departments with the exception of culture, and FCSS have their operating budgets reduced by 7%
7. No hiring for 2011
8. All non union staff be limited to a 2% wage increase for 2011
9. Municipal advertising be limited to $25,000
10. $65,000 be side aside to upgrade the municipal web site and for rebranding the municipality
After debate, and with everybody knowing that this was coming back on Jan 25th, the motion was defeated by a vote of 6-1 with only Councilor Saje in support.
Motion was then made to table the budget until Jan 25, which passed unanimously
6. High water levels in east Coleman: Councilor Mitchell requested that admin to bring this back at a later meeting providing council with information
7. Office procedures: Admin advised that they are working on this and will bring back at a later date.
Council Member Reports: Several councilors spoke about meeting they had attended.
Public Input: Mayor did not offer the opportunity for anybody to speak.
Public Hearing: None
Adoption of Agenda
Additions:
#5 under other business-High water levels in East Coleman
#6 Office Procedures
Under In Camera #1 Land
Motion to accept Agenda as amended passed unanimously
Adoption of Previous Minutes Jan 4, 2011
Correction, Motion made by Councilor Mitchell that states Councilor Mitchell abstained it should have been Councilor Londsbury
Motions to accept corrected Minutes passed unanimously
Delegations: None
Admin and Agency Reports: None
Business Arising from Minutes: None
Correspondence: Two letters one from John Pundyk and the other from Shane Stewart regarding tax increases. Both spoke to the high cost of taxes in the Crowsnest Pass, and the impact on attracting new people to the area.
Councilor Mitchell stated that both letters were good but offered no solutions to the municipalities financial problems, Councilor Saje stated that the solution is not to raise taxes.
Committee Reports: Minutes from G+P meeting of Jan 11,2011
Motion to accept minutes as presented passed unanimously
Bylaws: None
Notice of Motions: None
Other Business:
1. Get Outdoors Weekend: Motion made to support this initiative passed unanimously
2. Elected Officials Course: Motion for all of council except Councilor Saje will participate in an Economic Development Course in Pincher Feb 3, motion passed unanimously.
3. Councilor Saje requested approval for absence for the Feb 1st meeting, motion passed unanimously
4. Budget 2011: Some points regarding the budget
Proposed Budget sitting at a 5.3% increase
Various members of council spoke to a tax increase of between 0% and a small increase (?)
Administration to bring back program/service reductions for the meeting of January 25, and clarification for individual councilors concerns.
Various new positions are included in the budget-additional person in the HR department, one new programmer in the Recreation area, a full time Agricultural service field man, a Foreman for public works, and a part time position for the finance department, also two additional casuals over last year usage. (This will be served up Jan 25 as a cost reduction)
There was a lot of debate around the performance of facilities and various services/programs.
Prior to the debate Councilor Saje attempted to make a motion on the budget which the Mayor requested that he hold of on until the debate took place.
After the debate Councilor Londsbury moved to table the budget until Jan 25, to which Councilor Saje stated that he had attempted to make a motion prior that dealt with the budget.
The Mayor asked Councilor Londsbury to withdraw his motion, to allow Councilor Saje motion to be dealt with.
Councilor Saje then made a motion to accept the 2011 budget with the following conditions:
1.The $230,000 for the back hoe to be removed from the budget
2. IT archiving to be suspended until outside options can be looked at
3. IT Desktop be reduced to $10,000
4. IT soft ware be reduced to $12,000
5. Parade Float be reduced to $5,000
6. All departments with the exception of culture, and FCSS have their operating budgets reduced by 7%
7. No hiring for 2011
8. All non union staff be limited to a 2% wage increase for 2011
9. Municipal advertising be limited to $25,000
10. $65,000 be side aside to upgrade the municipal web site and for rebranding the municipality
After debate, and with everybody knowing that this was coming back on Jan 25th, the motion was defeated by a vote of 6-1 with only Councilor Saje in support.
Motion was then made to table the budget until Jan 25, which passed unanimously
6. High water levels in east Coleman: Councilor Mitchell requested that admin to bring this back at a later meeting providing council with information
7. Office procedures: Admin advised that they are working on this and will bring back at a later date.
Council Member Reports: Several councilors spoke about meeting they had attended.
Public Input: Mayor did not offer the opportunity for anybody to speak.
Monday, January 10, 2011
Budget continues in the Crowsnest Pass? When?
Checked out the Municipal web site today, looking at the agenda for the G+P meeting on Jan 11, I was surprised that there was no mention of the 2011 Budget.
I'm sure a lot of taxpayers are waiting anxiously to see what there tax bills will look like.
Interesting process going on in the city of Toronto right now. They similar to us have a new Mayor and council, who took the approach during their election campaign that they will do things differently that they will not increase taxes, that they will find the "inefficiencies" within the system. Sounds familiar doesn't it? any way the Council directed all of the department heads to reduce their budgets by 5%.
Today the Mayor announced due to the fact that two city managers are resisting that direction, that if they can not do the job, they will be replaced by people that can.
If you really want to find the inefficiencies, Council won't do that. Individual councilors only see the obvious issues that the vast majority of taxpayers already know. (Its not a huge revelation that we spend a lot of money each year on spring cleanup).
If you really want to see the inefficiencies cleaned up then the role council should fill is having the guts to direct administration. Management put in the right position with clear direction and support from council, and a council willing to deal with the reaction of vocal interest groups will find places where the municipality could be more efficient.
I'm sure a lot of taxpayers are waiting anxiously to see what there tax bills will look like.
Interesting process going on in the city of Toronto right now. They similar to us have a new Mayor and council, who took the approach during their election campaign that they will do things differently that they will not increase taxes, that they will find the "inefficiencies" within the system. Sounds familiar doesn't it? any way the Council directed all of the department heads to reduce their budgets by 5%.
Today the Mayor announced due to the fact that two city managers are resisting that direction, that if they can not do the job, they will be replaced by people that can.
If you really want to find the inefficiencies, Council won't do that. Individual councilors only see the obvious issues that the vast majority of taxpayers already know. (Its not a huge revelation that we spend a lot of money each year on spring cleanup).
If you really want to see the inefficiencies cleaned up then the role council should fill is having the guts to direct administration. Management put in the right position with clear direction and support from council, and a council willing to deal with the reaction of vocal interest groups will find places where the municipality could be more efficient.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Crowsnest Pass Council Highlights for December 21.
Crowsnest Council meeting Dec 21, 2010
Call to Order 7pm
Public Hearing None
Adoption of Agenda
Councilor Mitchell moved item #3 under other business to In Camera plus added one other personnel item to In camera
Councilor Gallant added to other business item #9 Affordable Housing Committee
Motion to accept the agenda as presented passed unanimously.
Adoption of previous minutes
1. Motion to accept Dec 7, 2010 Council with Larry Mitchell being added to attendance at the AAMDC convention in March (Missed in previous minutes) passed unanimously.
2. Minutes of Special Budget Meeting Dec 13, 2010 were not dealt with.
Delegations None
Administration and Agency Reports.
Sergeant Scott Howard from the RCMP presented his quarterly report, which includes detachment activity for the months of June, July, and August.
Business arising from the minutes
1. Draft advertising Policy
After much debate, it was decided to table this policy until January, but to commence advertising in both papers as of January 1st. Motion passed unanimously.
Correspondence
1. From Hector Goudreau-Regarding property legislation.
Motion that a letter be written thanking the minister for the information, also requesting that any further information coming from this legislation is shared with the municipality. Passed unanimously
Committee Reports
1. FCSS Minutes for October 27, 2010 passed unanimously
Bylaws None
Notices of Motion
Mayor Decoux informed council that he will be bringing forward a Motion in January to create a permanent Policy Committee that will be made up of himself, the CAO and the legislative Secretary. In addition members of the public or municipal departments will be included as deemed necessary.
Other Business
1. Adoption of 2011 Interim Budget
Motion was made to adopt one of three options presented by administration council attempted to move option 2 which would have accepted the budget as presented by administration with the issues of new hiring and water meters put on hold until council received further information. This option was defeated then a second motion came forth to carry on with 2010’s budget as an interim until council as the opportunity to pass a new budget. The second motion passed unanimously.
2. Contract Extension with Enmax, this will not be ready until the end of April will be brought back to council at that point
3. Subdivision Development authority Board appointment. Surprisingly this was moved to In camera, usually and according to the MGA only issues regarding Land, Legal, or Labour, go In Camera.
4. Subdivision Development Appeal Board Appointment. Motion was made to appoint Rupert Hewison to the board, passed unanimously.
5. Appointment to the Municipal Heritage Board. Under the terms of reference of this board a member of council sits on the board to represent the SDA board, a motion was made to appoint Councilor Mitchell to this board, which passed unanimously
6.Request to lease Municipal Lands for Parking. This was regarding Mohawk Excavating application to lease the MDM lands for another year to park their equipment on. Councilor Gallant excused himself due to a conflict of interest. Councilor Gail made a motion to have administration attempt to find a site in the Frank Industrial park that could be fenced, lighten, and power supplied for commercial equipment to park on. This motion was defeated by a tie vote.
A motion was then made to deny the applicants request, this was passed unanimously.
7. Business Appreciation Certificate, Motion was made to accept Councilor Gallants recommendation passed unanimously.
8. Oldman Watershed Council support request. Motion was made to support this group to the tune of $1724 per year (30 cents per capita) passed unanimously. Second motion made to send Councilor Saje to the AGM of this particular group. Motion passed unanimously
Pending Coferences. Motion was made to send Mayor Decoux, Councilors Mitchell, Gail, and the CAO to the AAMDC in Edmonton March 21-23. In addition Mayor Decoux and Councilor Saje to the FCM in Halifax June 2-6. Motion was passed with Councilor Saindon opposed.
9. Affordable Housing Committee. Councilor Gallant requested that all information regarding this committee be brought forth to council at the G+P meeting on Jan 11,2011.
Council Member reports
Comments revolved around the following issues: Municipal Heritage board not meeting since April. York Creek Lodge expansions and renovations, in addition the municipality will be required to provide land for the future expansion.
Public Input None
In Camera- One personnel issue, and the SDA board appointment
Business Out of Camera
Motion by Councilor Mitchell to reject the recommendations of the SDA board for appointments due to it being made prior to the closing deadline for board applicants.
Motion passed unanimously.
Call to Order 7pm
Public Hearing None
Adoption of Agenda
Councilor Mitchell moved item #3 under other business to In Camera plus added one other personnel item to In camera
Councilor Gallant added to other business item #9 Affordable Housing Committee
Motion to accept the agenda as presented passed unanimously.
Adoption of previous minutes
1. Motion to accept Dec 7, 2010 Council with Larry Mitchell being added to attendance at the AAMDC convention in March (Missed in previous minutes) passed unanimously.
2. Minutes of Special Budget Meeting Dec 13, 2010 were not dealt with.
Delegations None
Administration and Agency Reports.
Sergeant Scott Howard from the RCMP presented his quarterly report, which includes detachment activity for the months of June, July, and August.
Business arising from the minutes
1. Draft advertising Policy
After much debate, it was decided to table this policy until January, but to commence advertising in both papers as of January 1st. Motion passed unanimously.
Correspondence
1. From Hector Goudreau-Regarding property legislation.
Motion that a letter be written thanking the minister for the information, also requesting that any further information coming from this legislation is shared with the municipality. Passed unanimously
Committee Reports
1. FCSS Minutes for October 27, 2010 passed unanimously
Bylaws None
Notices of Motion
Mayor Decoux informed council that he will be bringing forward a Motion in January to create a permanent Policy Committee that will be made up of himself, the CAO and the legislative Secretary. In addition members of the public or municipal departments will be included as deemed necessary.
Other Business
1. Adoption of 2011 Interim Budget
Motion was made to adopt one of three options presented by administration council attempted to move option 2 which would have accepted the budget as presented by administration with the issues of new hiring and water meters put on hold until council received further information. This option was defeated then a second motion came forth to carry on with 2010’s budget as an interim until council as the opportunity to pass a new budget. The second motion passed unanimously.
2. Contract Extension with Enmax, this will not be ready until the end of April will be brought back to council at that point
3. Subdivision Development authority Board appointment. Surprisingly this was moved to In camera, usually and according to the MGA only issues regarding Land, Legal, or Labour, go In Camera.
4. Subdivision Development Appeal Board Appointment. Motion was made to appoint Rupert Hewison to the board, passed unanimously.
5. Appointment to the Municipal Heritage Board. Under the terms of reference of this board a member of council sits on the board to represent the SDA board, a motion was made to appoint Councilor Mitchell to this board, which passed unanimously
6.Request to lease Municipal Lands for Parking. This was regarding Mohawk Excavating application to lease the MDM lands for another year to park their equipment on. Councilor Gallant excused himself due to a conflict of interest. Councilor Gail made a motion to have administration attempt to find a site in the Frank Industrial park that could be fenced, lighten, and power supplied for commercial equipment to park on. This motion was defeated by a tie vote.
A motion was then made to deny the applicants request, this was passed unanimously.
7. Business Appreciation Certificate, Motion was made to accept Councilor Gallants recommendation passed unanimously.
8. Oldman Watershed Council support request. Motion was made to support this group to the tune of $1724 per year (30 cents per capita) passed unanimously. Second motion made to send Councilor Saje to the AGM of this particular group. Motion passed unanimously
Pending Coferences. Motion was made to send Mayor Decoux, Councilors Mitchell, Gail, and the CAO to the AAMDC in Edmonton March 21-23. In addition Mayor Decoux and Councilor Saje to the FCM in Halifax June 2-6. Motion was passed with Councilor Saindon opposed.
9. Affordable Housing Committee. Councilor Gallant requested that all information regarding this committee be brought forth to council at the G+P meeting on Jan 11,2011.
Council Member reports
Comments revolved around the following issues: Municipal Heritage board not meeting since April. York Creek Lodge expansions and renovations, in addition the municipality will be required to provide land for the future expansion.
Public Input None
In Camera- One personnel issue, and the SDA board appointment
Business Out of Camera
Motion by Councilor Mitchell to reject the recommendations of the SDA board for appointments due to it being made prior to the closing deadline for board applicants.
Motion passed unanimously.
Friday, December 10, 2010
Budget starts In the Crowsnest Pass 2011
Monday @ the municipal office starting at 4pm.
Just a couple of what I believe to be relevant information from the election campaign now this process is beginning.
As a councilor, I will not vote for any increase to property taxes for any reason - period! It is time to take a hard look at the services we have and the way business is conducted by the municipality.
My many years of experience in operations within large corporations reveals to me that we have a huge opportunity to take these cost reductions and use them to keep our tax increases at or near 0%.
First comment there is no possibility of miss interpretation of that statement, the second comment what is near to zero?
Just a couple of what I believe to be relevant information from the election campaign now this process is beginning.
As a councilor, I will not vote for any increase to property taxes for any reason - period! It is time to take a hard look at the services we have and the way business is conducted by the municipality.
My many years of experience in operations within large corporations reveals to me that we have a huge opportunity to take these cost reductions and use them to keep our tax increases at or near 0%.
First comment there is no possibility of miss interpretation of that statement, the second comment what is near to zero?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)