First of all I would say congratulations to the new council on passing a budget with a 0% increase.
Some comments raised with me today around town regarding this budget.
Why didn't the previous council pass a budget with a 0% increase?
Good question first of all we could have. Last year we raised taxes 3.2%, remember each 1% increase in taxes equals roughly $65,000. So 3.2% equalled $200,000.
How can I make the statement that we could have done 0%.
Well think about this, in 2010 council placed $450,000 back into reserves, council also took $250,000 and purchased equipment. That a total of $700,000 minus the $200,000 (tax increase) that would have left $500,000 divided by $65,000 that comes out to 7.7% yes if the last council had took the same position as this council, taxes could have been "cut" by 7.7%.
Why did they not do that especially in an election year?
I can only speak for myself.
After years of depleting the municipal reserves and arguing that we needed to get our financies in order. I felt it was time and the responsible thing to do to start rebuilding those reserves. In fact on a number of occasions I heard present councilors stress the need for building up the reserves.
Two, previous council had a policy of spending $250,000 each year to replace the aging equipment fleet, not by incurring debt but by actually putting aside dollars each year.
Number of dollars allocated in 2011 to reserves? Zero
Number of dollars allocated to purchase equipment $550,000 all of it in debt.
How many new employees will be hired because of this new budget?
One new Foreman position for public works
One new position for HR
One new position for Community Services, one employee was previously looking after programming and FCSS, there will now be a full time position for each job (1 becomes 2)
One half time position for finance.
One full time position for Agricultural Services this used to be a part time position
Did the Mayor state that over time, positions will be eliminated by attrition, retirement and reassignment of job duties?
Yes he did, do you really think that CUPE is going to co-operate with management to eliminate positions. Do you really believe that positions will not be refilled? we will find out in March.
Another councilor as stated on his blog that at least we did not raise taxes in our first year 11.2% like the previous council.
Well first of all let me say I never voted for that, so I will not take on that responsibility.
Second the last council left the municipality in a much better financial position our last year we left a budget with a surplus of $450,000 to be placed back into reserves. In 2007 the new council was left with a deficit to deal with.
Also this council did not have the anchor around its neck of having to put $100,000 plus into the Crowsnest Centre! another 2%.
The comment was made last night that taxes should have gone up 2-3%, I ask why with no money in reserves and financing new equipment quite the opposite taxes should have gone down.
But the budget is done now which is good, and we will see where things go. The comment was made during the budget process that between council and administration enough savings could be found in the next six months to pay for the back hoe. So I look forward to seeing a huge surplus in 2011
Bringing you information, opinions and views on the political scene in the Crowsnest Pass since 2008
Showing posts with label Deficits. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deficits. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Friday, June 25, 2010
Wildrose Party grows again?
Today at 2pm Danielle Smith Leader of the Wildrose Party is holding a press conference, prior to her parties convention.
The rumour mill is running rampant that former Conservative Party MLA and Tory Minister Guy Boutilier will be joining the party.
Will this be another nail in the coffin for Ed Stelmach?
With the annoucement yesterday that the province's deficit was only $1 billion last year, I am assuming that was suppose to be a good news story to deflect from what the Wildrose is doing this weekend.
The rumour mill is running rampant that former Conservative Party MLA and Tory Minister Guy Boutilier will be joining the party.
Will this be another nail in the coffin for Ed Stelmach?
With the annoucement yesterday that the province's deficit was only $1 billion last year, I am assuming that was suppose to be a good news story to deflect from what the Wildrose is doing this weekend.
Labels:
Conservatives,
Danielle Smith,
Deficits,
Guy Boutilier,
Wildrose Party
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Ottawa $55 Billion deficit and we are subsidizing Business
My fellow blogger Mr Prince beat me to it! http://blog.johnprince.ca/2010/06/pork-barreling-politics-alive-and-well.html
I ask the question how does the average Joe on the street get his information on politics, it should be through a totally unbiased media that reports the "news". How can the media be unbiased when it is paid off by the government in power. On the release below you will see that Ted Menzies is providing $420,605 to the local "unbiased" media in his riding.
When you do the math on 308 riddings that's $129,546,340 that's a lot of money.
http://www.tedmenzies.ca/EN/5058/114426
Does anybody know anything about this program? when did it start, who brought it in? why are the feds doing this?
I ask the question how does the average Joe on the street get his information on politics, it should be through a totally unbiased media that reports the "news". How can the media be unbiased when it is paid off by the government in power. On the release below you will see that Ted Menzies is providing $420,605 to the local "unbiased" media in his riding.
When you do the math on 308 riddings that's $129,546,340 that's a lot of money.
http://www.tedmenzies.ca/EN/5058/114426
Does anybody know anything about this program? when did it start, who brought it in? why are the feds doing this?
Monday, December 8, 2008
Budget Process in the Crowsnest Pass Continues
Well tomorrow night we are back at it. We will be reviewing Administration, Culture and Recreation departments Tuesday night Dec 9th. Followed up by Public Works Wednesday night Dec 10th.
Right now we are looking at a budget that is presently under funded by close to $1.7 million (that is the amount that taxes would have to increase if we did not cut anything.
Made up of the following:
Tax Shortfall --------------------$1,442,479
2007 Municipal deficit -----------$110,000
2007 Crowsnest Centre deficit ---$94,031
2008 Municipal deficit -----------$???????
2008 Crowsnest Centre deficit--- $???????
Total-----------------------------$1,646,510
Right now we are looking at a budget that is presently under funded by close to $1.7 million (that is the amount that taxes would have to increase if we did not cut anything.
Made up of the following:
Tax Shortfall --------------------$1,442,479
2007 Municipal deficit -----------$110,000
2007 Crowsnest Centre deficit ---$94,031
2008 Municipal deficit -----------$???????
2008 Crowsnest Centre deficit--- $???????
Total-----------------------------$1,646,510
Labels:
Crowsnest Pass Finances,
Deficits,
Property Taxes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)