G+P meeting
Some interesting delegations showed up for the afternoon
meeting.
Leone Stacheruk with a large group of Swimming Pool Society
members appeared before council to present their position on changes at the
Swimming pool. The Society felt that they had not been treated fairly over the
last year, that they were not interested in running the pool on a daily basis
only that they wished to hire the manager and have input into the pool budget
as they had for the previous twenty years. Communications between
administration and the society appeared to be terrible at the best but Council
assured them that they would take their comments in consideration at the
council meeting that night. Then the Mayor went on to talk about how change is
difficult but this is what the people of the Crowsnest
Pass voted for and this is what
they are getting.
Mrs Stacheruk at the closing of her presentation told Mayor
Decoux to keep in mind not “all changes are not for the better”
Val Brekenridge then gave a presentation on behalf of the
Hillcrest Memorial Mine Committee, next year is the 100th anniversary
of the Hillcrest Mine Disaster, 236 men died in what a lot of people do not
realize was Canada’s largest single mine disaster. The group is going to be putting
on a memorial from June 19-21 2014 ,
inviting dignitaries from the Governor General, Prime Minister and down. They
need $150,000 to back stop this event and are seeking support from various
levels of government, corporate sponsors, and anybody else that is willing.
Penny Warris gave an update on the Rum Runner Days event
coming up the third weekend of July all of the information is available at http://rumrunnerdays.com/
Next came topics of discussion starting with the
anti-bullying bylaw which Councillor Saje had brought forward previously with a
draft anticipated by this time the Director for this area Mr Headrick informed
council that there was a lot more research to be done in this area. He also
informed council that an offer will be made on Friday to an individual with a
wealth of knowledge in the issue of bullying to take on the FCSS coordinator
position which would help in moving the bylaw forward.
At this point, I had to leave due to a prior commitment.
Council Meeting
I was surprised to arrive at council chambers to a packed
house of concerned taxpayers.
Picking up my agenda I was surprised to see the Pass Pool
authority item on the agenda this council has taken a consistent position for almost
three years that an item dealt with at G+P does not come to council on the same
day. So that council can have time to digest the information presented and have
time to formulate an opinion to have an intelligent debate
I was also surprised by the absence on the agenda of an
update on the hotel, nothing from Medican, Group Vachon or the Penrose group of
companies. Maybe the CAO was going to
present a verbal update.
The meeting began with a public hearing on the new land use
bylaw most of the speakers were opposed to the bylaw, over concerns regarding
the historical down town areas and issues with the signage portion. At this
point in a very rare move the Mayor attempted to persuade council to move the
agenda around to bring forth the 2 + 3 reading. In another rare move Council
disagreed with the Mayor and left the agenda the way it was written.
RC Strategies will be the consultant used to do the
Recreation Feasibility study. We were also informed that the EDO
as met with a large number of groups and will be continuing that process to get
herself familiar with the community.
Dave Morrison the ski hill manager then gave a very in depth
report on the operations of the ski hill apparently both usage and revenue were
up this season despite a late start, good news for a very important part of our
recreation program.
Pass Pool Authority, council in a rare move apparently had enough
time to digest the information they were provided earlier in the day and voted
to remove the Pass Pool authority. Strangely they used the Ski Hill Society has
an example of what they wanted to achieve at the pool. A board that provides
the municipality it’s budget for municipal approval, hires the Manager who in
turn hires the employee’s. The board takes no active role in the day to day
operation of the facility and all expenditures and revenues go through the
municipality. Unless I completely miss understood, the pool society it was
exactly what they have done for twenty some years and what they wished to
continue doing. During the debate Councilor Saje even made the point we do not
need to get rid of the authority just agree on the terms of reference. Even so
council voted 6-1 to get rid of the board (Councilor Gallant was opposed I
tried to catch his reason for voting against but never heard one, the cynical
part of me thought he might be playing politics but that’s just my opinion)
2013 Development Permitting and Business Licensing Report
the Mayor was very excited about numbers being up but did not share a lot with
us. (Maybe this is the beginning of the economic boom)
Subdivision extension approval was given to Wolfgang
Weinrich on his 50 unit RV park.
Bylaw 868 Land Use Bylaw after much debate, concerns about
themes and signage concerns received both second and third reading.
Note: Keep in mind one very important number $4325
5 comments:
http://rumrunnerdays.com/
Single "m".
"Change is difficult" can be an excuse for every screw-up. People asked for change and the 2510 residents of voting age are just CAVERS who don't understand "change is difficult." There sure is a need for change come October, and it should not be difficult.
Was there anything on the hotel, didn't, that letter say June 17?
They were supposed to go "in-camera," for "legal," according to last night's agenda. Possibly for an update from the Medican lawyers, or some other lawyers. But it was cancelled.
For a small town, with a limited tax base, we sure generate a lot of expensive legal work.
Does anyone know how much was spent on legal fees and auditor fees to date? With this much legal work generated, isn't this about time to set up a legal department? Director of Legal Services has a nice ring to it.
Reading the minutes, I got the impression they considered the Public Hearing to be a bothersome formality, they had no intention of making any changes to the Land Use Bylaw.
And Mitchell moved to table it, but then it was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Did he vote for it?
Bruce reported on his Vancouver junket - did we get our money's worth from that?
Post a Comment